Michelle Malkin

Obama’s Campaign Bully Brigade Rides Again

By Michelle Malkin - Friday, March 2, 2012

They’re baaaaaaack. Barack Obama’s election-year goon squad kicked into high gear this week by kicking the president’s fiercest opponents in the teeth and targeting their pocketbooks. Returning to bully business as usual, the Obama campaign launched a brazen salvo against two prominent conservative critics and their legions of private citizen donors.

Let’s be clear (to use Obama’s favorite phrase): This is not just the politics of personal destruction. It’s a vendetta of campaign finance destruction. Under the guise of “disclosure,” Team Obama is exploiting the power of high government office to intimidate lawful, peaceful contributors who support limited-government causes.

In a scathing fundraising e-mail appeal, Obama campaign manager Jim Messina name-checked wealthy free-market philanthropists Charles and David Koch — along with a growing movement of grassroots conservatives who have freely, voluntarily and legally given money to the Koch-founded nonprofit activist group Americans for Prosperity and its sister foundation. As a speaker at several AFP events over the past three years, I’ve met thousands of like-minded, hardworking Americans who support their work at the local, state and federal levels.

The Koches’ sins are to 1. follow tax law and protect the identities of donors to their charitable organizations, and 2. exercise their free speech by funding advocacy ads informing the public about the Obama administration’s jobs toll destruction and failed green energy “investments.” (Their most recent TV spot zeroed in on the taxpayer-funded Solyndra bankruptcy.)

“When you attempt to drown out (Americans’) voices through unlimited, secret contributions to pursue a special-interest agenda that conflicts with what’s best for our nation, you must expect some scrutiny of your actions,” Messina railed. The threat of scrutiny was backed by Obama himself, whose official campaign Twitter account directed 12 million-plus followers this week to “add your name to demand that the Koch brothers make their donors public.”

But Obama’s own former top officials run a so-called super PAC (Priorities USA) that also maintains nonprofit status and subsidizes advocacy ads while protecting its donor base. The White House, of course, is mum on the unlimited, secret contributions that Obama is now encouraging wealthy liberals and lobbyists to make in pursuit of his own special-interest agenda — i.e., re-election.

The president’s flapping lips are also sealed when it comes to applying his disclosure standards to the shadowy, George Soros-backed Center for American Progress, which has supplied the Obama administration with countless top policy staffers, including special Department of Health and Human Services assistant Michael Halle and HHS Director Jeanne Lambrew, a former senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. CAP founder John Podesta was Obama’s transition chief, overseeing the backroom process of rewarding friends and allies with plum positions. CAP flacks shrugged off conflict-of-interest questions: “We respect the privacy of supporters who have chosen not to make their donations public,” CAP spokeswoman Jennifer Palmieri said.

As for respecting the privacy rights of Obama’s foes? Not so much.

It seems to me no small coincidence that this disclosure charade comes just as numerous tea party organizations are reporting that the Internal Revenue Service has targeted them for audits. According to Colleen Owens of the Richmond (Va.) Tea Party, several fiscal-conservative activist groups in Virginia, Hawaii, Ohio and Texas have received a spate of IRS letters. The missives demand extensive requests to identity volunteers, board members and … donors.

This is B.O.’s M.O. His bully brigade did the same to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and its donors during the November 2010 midterms as payback for the organization’s ads opposing the federal health care takeover. And in 2008, Obama’s allies at a Soros-tied outfit sent out “warning” letters to 10,000 top GOP givers “hoping to create a chilling effect that will dry up contributions.” Witch hunt leader Tom Matzzie, formerly of Soros-funded MoveOn.org, bragged of “going for the jugular” and said the warning letter was just the first step, “alerting donors who might be considering giving to right-wing groups to a variety of potential dangers, including legal trouble, public exposure and watchdog groups digging through their lives.”

Matzzie also advertised a $100,000 bounty for dirt on conservative political groups “to create a sense of scandal around the groups” and dissuade donors from giving money. The effort was cheered by Accountable America adviser Judd Legum, founder of Think Progress — the same group that led the attack on the Chamber of Commerce and is run by Podesta’s Center for American Progress. Just as with the Obama super PAC led by former White House officials, Matzzie’s group “Accountable America” was a 501(c)(4) nonprofit entity that shielded the identity of its donors.

Oh, and remember this? In 2008, St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch and St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, both Obama promoters, threatened to bring criminal libel charges against anyone who spread what they considered “false criticisms” of their Dear Leader.

It is no small exaggeration to conclude that Team Obama’s dead aim is to chill conservative speech and criminalize conservative dissent. All Americans for prosperity must push back with one voice: No, you can’t.

COPYRIGHT 2011 MICHELLE MALKIN/CREATORS.COM

Michelle Malkin is a conservative blogger, columnist, regular Fox News contributor, and author of many New York Times bestselling books.

Be the first to read Michelle Malkin's columns and other Voice of Sanity articles by signing up today and having them delivered directly into your inbox each morning.

Additional articles by Michelle Malkin

Respond to Writer

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints. Make your case passionately, but please keep your comments civil and to the point (150 words or less). Obscene, profane, abusive, or off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion. Thanks for your participation.

21 Responses to “Obama’s Campaign Bully Brigade Rides Again”

  1. Dawg em says:

    Thugs, punks and goons. Yep, that about sums it up.

  2. The LookOut says:

    The Lip Flapper in Chief, and his Radicals will stop
    at Nothing to Punish any discenter. Lie & Label
    is thier M O

  3. SCSharon says:

    Looks like courage is in order!

  4. Pete DiOrio says:

    It would be nice to think that in the long run the guys in white hats will win, and truth, justice, and the American way will prevail. Perhaps it won’t all turn out that way. White hat individualists have a pretty poor scorecard overall against black hat statists in the grand sweep of history. My own perspective on where things are headed and what it will take to preserve liberty has done a full 180 over the past few years. I hardly recognize myself – and I resent it.

    • reunion says:

      resentment can be corrosive, or it can be rocket fuel…

      as for the kochtopus, no tears deserved. search the term (mises or lrc or just giburu {scroogle has been done in…}.

      the kochtopus vs. murray n. rothbard, is a good place to start.

  5. Tom Holmquist says:

    The demon-crates are ruthless in their attacks, no doubt, but what about the underhanded ruthless attacks of the “so called conservative media” FOX NEWS with their continual derogatory remarks of Ron Paul and even ignore him as a candidate. Like the reporter slipped up the other day and said there was four candidates left and then immediately said I “I mean three”…Talk about despicable politics against a man who’s ONLY agenda is honesty and to restore America. FOX NEWS is the RED wing of the same DIRTY BIRD. Fox news makes me sick. Neither fair nor balanced, in fact, they are the undercover media for George Soros’s

  6. Bryan says:

    I am struck by the blatant evil of the liberal machine and much of what purports to be conservative but is just more of the same old big-gov crowd. The swine are jockeying for position among the ranks of the political elites in some pre-conceived notion of a new world order which supposedly lurks just around the bend, lest they be relegated to serf-hood along with all the rest of We-the-People. It’s amazing how all the toadies and maggots have fallen right into line. I’m disgusted.

  7. reunion says:

    stalin didn’t care much for hitler, either (but was good buddies with churchill & roosevelt).

    “At this moment, for example, in 1984 (if it was 1984), Oceania was at war with Eurasia and in alliance with Eastasia. In no public or private utterance was it ever admitted that the three powers had at any time been grouped along different lines. Actually, as Winston well knew, it was only four years since Oceania had been at war with Eastasia and in alliance with Eurasia. But that was merely a piece of furtive knowledge, which he happened to possess because his memory was not satisfactorily under control. Officially the change of partners had never happened. Oceania was at war with Eurasia: therefore Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia. The enemy of the moment always represented absolute evil, and it followed that any past or future agreement with him was impossible. (1.3.16)”

    • reunion says:

      erato….

      faux property rights in entitlements tend strongly in that direction…hypersensitivity bennies…….vacations paid for via ‘victim’ recompenses…system-gaming…….

      • Erato says:

        Demanding physical property rights for emotional ‘property’? Unfortunately, it works all too often… you’re supposed to restrain yourself because someone else doesn’t approve, it hurts their feelings, it makes them feel… and they will control you if they can and try to hurt you if they can’t…. putting the onus on the other person, rather than themselves. I see that in relationships, too.

        • reunion says:

          causes them to feel might be a little more precise (than “makes”, which points to an external “maker”…)

          in terms of the recent engagement with rs, the entitlement, via positive law / “social justice” (which is diametrically opposed to natural law) is unrestricted access to private property (and if “un” is objected to, then call less restricted access than the now ersatz owner would have it if he truly were owner…).

          this artificial entitlement then becomes a “property right” in the formerly private property, now taken, “converted” into commons. anyone who wants can enter yellowstone park and anyone who wants can enter the yellowstone deli.

          concept of commons has been expanded. it is pernicious and has no place in laissez-faire, free market capitalism, liberty/ anarchism. in the various authoritarian structures – socialism, communism, fascism – the jackbooted insistence on commons is the shared dna. but it is also true that the bovines prefer the illusion of wide open spaces; seems like “freedom” to them.

          so what you have is a symbiotic “free range”. some pine for a shane to ride in, save the sodbusters. a movie treatment “solution”.

          he-ros & her-os & o’s – oh my! kansas didn’t change one bit; dorothy changed (w/o ever even leaving the place). that’s what a knock to the head can do.

          do you hear me knocking? am i coming in? for the lost legions, dave edmunds “i hear you knocking” is the looped theme song…..(great tune).

        • reunion says:

          auh! “causes” is not much of an improvement. need a word…

        • Erato says:

          I meant ‘makes’, I should have written it that way.
          Um…. hmmm… struggling here… triggers? elicits? Maybe change the wording to they’re upset.

        • reunion says:

          so far projection or projects is the best i can think of. puts the action with the actor, rather than the scapegoat.

        • Erato says:

          how about mirroring and reflection?

        • reunion says:

          if you mean ‘the world is a mirror’, yes.

          another song came to mind. check out george michael’s “freedom”. there’s a w/lyrics version on youtube.

          “is that i don’t belong to you
          and you don’t belong to me”

        • Erato says:

          it’s so simple, really…

          … but I never thought I’d hear it from George Michael, lol. Wonderful video, it made me smile… er, I mean I smiled :-)

          (and yes, I did mean the world is a mirror)

        • reunion says:

          “it’s got a good beat and you can dance to it”. lol

          “mirror” is the buddhist metaphor for projection (and a good metaphor beats therapy-speak every time…).

  8. Erato says:

    Numskull? Nefarious? Nail-biter? Ninny? Neo-con?

    • Erato says:

      A cataclysm in illiberal packaging? I was going to guess narcissist, lol

      • Erato says:

        I can certainly relate to being penalized for the ignorance of others. But I’ve never understood why one person must be punished because of another person’s inability to control (take responsibility for) their own feelings.

Leave a Reply

1500 characters maximum.

To Receive Free Daily
Articles Via E-mail
Click Here

Featured Columnists

Liberty Education
Interview Series

Robert Ringer interviews top political, economic, and social leaders on today's most vital and controversial issues.

Grover Norquist Interview

Featured Interview:
Grover Norquist

Audio file loading...

More Interviews


Recent Comments

  • Hugh May 22, 12:55 PM
    on The Repudiation of Romney the Repudiator Sorry, Robert, Obama is right. The election IS about Bain Capital; it's the symbol of...
  • Obomney May 21, 11:28 PM
    on Romney Nightmare: Ron Paul Resurfaces Yet Again So what are you freedom lovers doing to stop me from dick tating over the...
  • Rick May 21, 9:24 PM
    on Was Saving GM Worker’s Job Fair? If he hadn't bailed them out, our country's unemployment insurance system would have been overloaded...
  • Bill May 21, 4:45 PM
    on John Stossel on Intuitively Trusting the Government Your bullet point questions are excellent, could not have been stated better. ["defective intuition —...
  • Marte May 21, 3:11 PM
    on John Stossel on Intuitively Trusting the Government Robert - What I want to know is how we can use gradualism to turn...