
The Truth About the Israeli “Occupiers”
Now that our dear leader has again shown his contempt for Israel and his sentimental attachment to radical Muslims, Israelis are feeling the heat from Jew haters worldwide more than at any time since World War II. Obama’s modern-day version of the final solution is for Israel to simply cooperate in its own suicide by giving up the Golan Heights, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip. (Predictably, he has since fudged a bit on the issue for political purposes.)
In exchange, the Israelis would get … you guessed it … absolutely nothing! The Muslims don’t even need the West Bank or the Gaza Strip. If Israel just gave the Golan Heights back to Syria (whom, we are reminded by Hillary Goofus, is ruled by a “reformer”), it would cease to exist in about a month. Nothing like looking down on your enemies from above and having the luxury of choosing the most efficient way to destroy them.
In 1967, after years of threatening to “wipe Israel off the map,” Egypt and other Arab countries finally mustered the courage to attack. They huffed and they puffed and … well, they blew their own house down, humiliating themselves and the entire Arab world in the process. Israel’s superior military forces crushed the puff-prone Arabs in six days, from whence came the name “Six-Day War.”
Since then, land annexed by the Israelis following that war has been referred to by the Muslim world and progressives in the Western world as “the occupied territories.” But what those who rail on about “Israeli occupation” of these territories either don’t realize or fail to acknowledge is that immediately following the Six-Day War, the Israeli government, in a gesture of goodwill, offered to return the Golan Heights to Syria, the Sinai peninsula to Egypt, and most of the West Bank to Jordan in exchange for peace.
The defeated Arab nations responded to Israel’s offer by arrogantly declaring “no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, and no negotiations with Israel.” Hmm … not a whole lot of incentive for Israel to try to please their attackers.
An important fact of life that no one ever seems to mention when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian land dispute is that when you win a war, you take whatever pleases you (unless, of course, you’re the United States of America). When a bunch of lunatics who spend their lives focused on death and destruction threaten to kill you, then attack you, why in the world would they expect you to give back their land after you crush them? It’s simply not the way life works.
Here’s a tip to nations around the globe who harbor fantasies about hegemony: If you don’t want your land taken from you, don’t attack another country. Period. The Arab world needs to man up and take responsibility for the consequences of its actions. I think most Americans have passed the point of compassion fatigue when it comes to the Arab victimization game.
But there’s yet a harsher reality. Even if someone attacks you, and you lose, history teaches us that you’re still likely to have to give up some or all of your land. After the Normans invaded England in 1066 A.D., they didn’t negotiate with the Anglo-Saxons. They simply took over, and today, nearly a thousand years later, no one questions the legitimacy of the British Royal Family.
It all comes under the heading of the Kick-Butt Reality of War, which is a subheading of life’s number-one rule: Life Isn’t Fair. Thus, it’s not surprising that neither the Maoris in New Zealand nor the Aboriginals in Australia ever got their lands back from the English. Though they are now independent nations, the descendents of their English conquerors pretty much run things Down Under.
The Maoris aren’t naïve enough to believe they’re ever going to get New Zealand back, nor do the Aboriginals believe they’re going to be handed the keys to Australia. Instead, the Maoris have pretty much fit into the Western way of life, and even the Aboriginals, who were treated much more shabbily than the Maoris, are making significant strides in acclimating to Western culture.
What makes the so-called Palestinian situation unique is that the Jews were already in old Jerusalem as far back as 6,000 years ago. But who got there first is a moot point, at best, because the city has been destroyed twice and changed hands forty-four times over the millennium.
Further, the Jews insist that God gave them the land, and that’s a pretty strong debating point to overcome, even if you don’t agree with it. The truth is that the situation is so complex that no one knows all the facts, and, worse, most of the loudest voices (such as those in Hollywood) know almost none of the facts. But some things are crystal clear.
First, Israel took a virtual wasteland and built it into a modern, democratic, wealthy nation that has given the world incredible breakthroughs in medicine, science, and technology.
Second, the so-called Palestinians have spent sixty-four years painting themselves as victims, living in poverty as a result of corrupt leaders (such as Yasser Arafat, who diverted billions in foreign-aid to his personal bank accounts abroad), failing to engage in entrepreneurship, and dissipating their energies by focusing on their hatred of Israelis.
Third, thousands of wars throughout history have left millions of people unhappy. Again, life isn’t fair, and the Kick-Butt Reality of War always prevails, regardless of whether it displeases some people. (Think American Indians.) What I’m saying here is that the so-called Palestinian displacement is not unique. It’s time for Arabs to get over it and start focusing on living productive lives.
The “Mid-East peace process” is a myth. When TV talking heads use a cliché like “jumpstart the Mid-East peace talks,” you have to wonder if they’re serious. The reality is that there will never be peace between Muslims and Israelis. How can you have peace when the stated goal of one side is to exterminate the other?
To make matters worse, we now have a U.S. president who encouraged the removal of one of our strongest allies, Hosni Mubarak, which opened the door for his beloved Muslim Brotherhood pals to take power. This, in turn, will likely lead to the abrogation of Egypt’s peace treaty with Israel.
Having said all this, I will make an unequivocal prediction right here and now: If Israel were ever to be destroyed and the Jews were banished from the Holy Land, nothing would change for Mid-East Muslims. Nothing!
In other words, the fact that Jews now control Israel is a red herring. If Israel disappeared tomorrow, radical Muslims would start a frantic search for a new devil to blame for their dysfunctional lives. Nothing will change for the so-called Palestinians until they start acting like responsible adults and hold themselves accountable for their own failures.
They need to understand that when you continue to do the same thing over and over again, you’re going to get the same result. Muslims worldwide need to start getting up every morning and focusing on constructive pursuits rather than spending all their time plotting new ways to kill Jews. To use a well-worn cliché, they need to get a life.
You have permission to reprint this article so long as you place the following wording at the end of the article:
Copyright © 2012 Robert Ringer
ROBERT RINGER is a New York Times #1 bestselling author and host of the highly acclaimed Liberty Education Interview Series, which features interviews with top political, economic, and social leaders. He has appeared on Fox News, Fox Business, The Tonight Show, Today, The Dennis Miller Show, Good Morning America, The Lars Larson Show, ABC Nightline, and The Charlie Rose Show, and has been the subject of feature articles in such major publications as Time, People, The Wall Street Journal, Fortune, Barron's, and The New York Times.
To sign up for his one-of-a-kind, pro-liberty e-letter, A Voice of Sanity, Click Here.





Once again, Robert, you’ve covered every possible angle of the subject with flawless logic and indisputable facts so that anyone with an open mind would agree with you and come to the same conclusion. Alas, those with an anti-Israel agenda will see only what they want to see and refuse to face the truth even though it’s as obvious as a 500 pound gorilla in a sandbox.
I do agree with much of what Mr. Ringer says; however, I think the “truth” is that the real “occupiers” in this long dispute over lands, gods, and resources is a supper occupier, an occupier which rules by proxy: Amerika. I say, let’s end the occupation.
Israel, as a modern-day nation, has only been in existence since 1948: The same question could rightly be asked of the modern-day Jews that some are asking the Arabs, “why did you Jews have to declare independence and “occupy” what was then considered sovereign lands by the Arabs? Up until 1948, you Jews were conquered and scattered, so why didn’t you just assimilate or immigrate? Why did you have to start trouble (i.e. an ongoing, modern-day war)?
The truth is that there would be no modern-day state of Israel if the U.S.A. hadn’t intervened back in 1948 in behalf of those rag-tag Jews in the first place. The Jews can credit God all they want for their victory, but it was America—not God— which was directly responsible for The Neo Israeli State of 1948. You see, WWII had just ended, and The Great War eroded what was left of classical British colonialism. Great Britain, by the way, was the hegemonic superpower in the entire region at the time. Amerika (sic) was the new up and coming hegemonic superpower that influenced the United Nations (a collectivist governing body) to draw up the “partition plan” that segregated the Arabs from the Jews.
At the time(1948), Amerika, being a so called “judeo-christian nation,” was more than jubilant to have a new religious allay( aka The Israeli Puppet State) to use as a tool of coercion in a Middle East—-a land rich with natural resources. Yes, Amerika was very busy expanding its grip.
My point in relating this little history lesson is that if an individual wants to stop and think with an open mind about more than the one side of this story that was taught to them in some collectivist school, then she/he will quickly realize that Israel was and is merely a useful Amerikan tool to leverage cultural, corporate, ideological, political, monetary, and military hegemony over the entire region. Yes, that’s right, AMERIKA is the hegemonic nation that wants to rule. Great Amerika is the new Great Britain. And nobody, and I mean nobody, explains this fact better than Dr. Paul Craig Roberts. Dr. Roberts, who is the father of Reaganomics, deserves much credit for telling it like it is. Great Amerika or Amerika the Great, however you want to put it, is the personification of hegemony. The harsh reality is that Americka has become the country which opposes the golden laws: The Law of nonaggression and The Law of Value for Value.
If a person wants to be lied to, then all they have to do is continue to turn on the mainstream T.V. and listen to all the bobble-heads that are eager and more than happy to propagandize anybody that is gullible right down into a paradigm of deceit. Yes, good citizen of 1984 and 1948 never forget that you are an Amerikan. So what are you waiting for? Support Israel, support Saudi Arabia, support your country, support the wars, support the Military Industrial Complex, support the troops……….yes no matter what you think, support the troops. How could you be so evil as to not support the troops?
Well, do you know what? I no longer support the troops. In fact, I don’t support anything or anybody who turns America the beautiful into Amerika The Great.
Good article and to the point. By the way, it is moot, a legal term, not mute.
The problem over there is actually a problem from over here: “People” (like Ron Paul) think they (the Palestinians and Muslims in general) are like us. They are not. Their religion is based on the political control of EVERYONE. Period. That FACT was brought to light yesterday when the TV camera showed a hooded Muslim “demon-strator” with a sign that read “Islam will conquor the West”. People like Ron Paul look at that sign and say “they don’t really mean it.” The TRUTH is they DO MEAN IT. Until we, the Western Civilization (“Civil” being the operative word) understand this and deal with them from a reality-based perspective we will have what we have now; nothing substatiative in negotiating.
Their “law” says they can lie to us when it is beneficial for Islam. They do. Even if Ron Paul does think they are all “just like us”.
israel conducted a preemptive strike……..it was a well executed military operation ……israel was not attacked ……..the threats of attack especially from egypt placed israel in the position of needing to protect itself against overwhelming odds from several fronts…..israel desires peace as evidenced by their returning areas of the sinai that were captured during the military operation
Robert should get a radio show on WABC (or KABC).
He fits in nicely with the vile zionist jew hosts on those stations who completely repeat blatant lies over and over again about “our only ally in the middle east…DUH”
Robert how about addressing the U.S. Liberty incident…?(the one that the U.S, jewish run media didn’t report…)
How about addressing the fact that to get elected to Congress or Senate or President in the U.S. one has to pledge allegiance to (the gangster state of) israel.
How about how we give weapons technology to (the gangster state of) israel and they SELL it to China?
I’m sure you would like Jonathan Pollard released?
Remember this jew in the U.S. Navy who was spying for israel?
How about the looting and murder of civilians the (criminal)IDF(what a joke..)soldiers did when they attacked the “TERRORISTS” in Gaza 2 years ago…
Do you recall the “IDF” was using illegal phosphorus
bombs on the “terrorists” (terrorist children…).
How about when a “BRAVE” IDF soldier shot 4 little girls (terrorists…) in front of their mother?
Robert are you a jew or a media brainwashed moron?
> when you win a war, you take whatever pleases you
> (unless, of course, you’re the United States of
> America).
Not exactly.
All southern states of USA were Mexico’s, from California to Texas (ever wondered why many US cities have Spanish names? San Diego, San Antonio, Los Angeles, Sacramento… and a long et cetera), and USA took them on the Mexican-American war.
The following links illustrate a little:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican-American_War
http://www.historyguy.com/Mexican-American_War.html
Here some relevant text from those links:
- “American forces invaded and conquered New Mexico, California, and parts of what is currently northern Mexico; ”
- “American Navy conducted a blockade, and took several garrisons on the Pacific coast of Mexico—largely what is now California, but also farther south.”
- “The major consequence of the war was the forced Mexican Cession of the territories of Alta California and New Mexico to the U.S. in exchange for $18 million. Mexico accepted the Rio Grande as its national border, and the loss of Texas.”
- “The Mexican-American War was the first major conflict driven by the idea of “Manifest Destiny”; the belief that America had a God-given right, or destiny, to expand the country’s borders from ‘sea to shining sea’. This belief would eventually cause a great deal of suffering for many Mexicans, Native Americans and United States citizens.”
Your writings, Mr Ringer, are always worth the time to read them.
I can tell you have been watching Glenn Beck a lot lately (who I think has started getting a little fanatical); but I still consider your words as wisdom. Your books are a precious treasure for reference in my intellectual arsenal.
Kind regards.
Marantgal: I was well aware of those facts when I put in the parenthetical remark, and assumed someone would call me on it. But I was referring to the America of today. On reflection, I should have said “unless, of course, you’re the United States of America of the 21st century.” But you get an “A” for alertness.
RJR