
The Brain: A Work in Progress, Part I
By Robert Ringer
Cognitive science is the study of the brain mechanisms responsible for an individual’s thoughts, moods, decisions, and actions. Cognition refers to everything that takes place in an individual’s brain that helps him understand the world around him. To accomplish such an understanding involves such mental processes as concentration, memory, conceptualization, creativity, and emotions.
In his book The New Brain, Dr. Richard Restak uses the term “plasticity of the new brain” to refer to the capacity of the brain to transform itself. This is an incredibly exciting notion, and one that has endless positive ramifications.
Until recently, it was generally believed that the brain’s plasticity peaked out at young adulthood, if not earlier. But researchers now believe the brain is subject to transformation throughout life, which is why Restak appropriately refers to it as a “lifetime work in progress.”
Now that I’ve become a born-again behavioral modificationist, this makes perfect sense to me. When I was a Freudian laymanologist, I assumed that genetics and childhood experiences set everything in stone. It wasn’t until the headmaster at my son’s school told me that he had based his entire career on his belief in behavioral modification that I allowed myself to consider its merits.
That, in turn, led to my reading Reality Therapy, which I wrote about in a previous two-part article. The essence of that book is that no matter what happened to you in your childhood, no amount of rehashing the past can ever change it. On the other hand, by focusing on being a responsible adult today, you can change the way you feel about yourself, and about life, in the present.
Thus, whether you want to learn a foreign language, how to play tennis, or the techniques for writing good ad copy, you first have to make changes in your brain. And the key to making such changes is repetition, which I have written about many times in the past.
Repetition makes repeated impressions on your brain, but there’s a catch: If the repetitions are wrong (e.g., swinging a golf club incorrectly), you are not going to excel at the skill you have targeted. From whence comes the worn-out but true observation that only an insane person would continue to repeat the same thing over and over again and expect to achieve different results.
Which brings yet another question to the fore: If you continue to get negative results, should you invoke persistence … or is it more sane just to give up and move on to something else? The answer is that you definitely should be persistent, but, based on what you have learned through your experiences, you should try a different methodology.
Restak’s main point is that regardless of how much of success is due to genetics and how much is due to practice, the level of success one achieves is based on the plasticity of the brain. My take on this can be summed up in what I call the “C” Student/”A” Student Theory, which something that seems self-evident to me: In a majority of cases, a student with “C” intelligence who is willing to put forth the required effort can achieve “A” results.
I know this from firsthand experience, because I went from a 0.8 average in college to a 4.0 after a stint in the army. My military experience was so unpleasant that it made an indelible impression on my brain, which in turn caused me to become highly motivated to get good grades.
In other words, my brain’s plasticity made it possible for me to transform my view of the world. It was a cerebral transformation that opened my eyes to the reality that there is more to life than girls, booze, and playing poker. Once I redirected my energy from such trivial pursuits to studying every waking moment that I wasn’t in class, I was able to achieve “A’s” – even in such difficult subjects as physics and organic chemistry.
The plasticity of the brain is why you can accomplish great things without being born with superior intelligence or natural talent. And Dr. Restak maintains that a transformation of the brain can be achieved by sheer determination.
Fair enough, but that begs the question: What if your brain isn’t wired to be determined? We’ll take a look at the answer to that question in Part II of this article.
You have permission to reprint this article so long as you place the following wording at the end of the article:
Copyright © 2012 Robert Ringer
ROBERT RINGER is a New York Times #1 bestselling author and host of the highly acclaimed Liberty Education Interview Series, which features interviews with top political, economic, and social leaders. He has appeared on Fox News, Fox Business, The Tonight Show, Today, The Dennis Miller Show, Good Morning America, The Lars Larson Show, ABC Nightline, and The Charlie Rose Show, and has been the subject of feature articles in such major publications as Time, People, The Wall Street Journal, Fortune, Barron's, and The New York Times.
To sign up for his one-of-a-kind, pro-liberty e-letter, A Voice of Sanity, Click Here.





The brain’s inherent plasticity is perhaps the most wonderful revelation of modern science. What I have learned is that determination will only take you so far. Nature and nurture are still intertwined and you can’t go past your natural potential. Many of us have accepted the decrees of educators or our parents about the limits of our natural potential. The good news is they were wrong!
I will wait for part 2 before I reply in detail, but anybody interested in the subject should read at least two books: “Radical Constructivism” by Ernst von Glasersveld, and “Philolsophy in the Flesh”, by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson.
Robert,
I wonder how effective it is for a person to attempt to change thoughts and behavior patterns through repetition. It seems that most people are controlled by programming that is firmly entrenched in their subconscious mind. For this reason they only marginally benefit from self-help books and material. This, of course, is better than no improvement.
It seems to me that a person must do something else to make great strides in changing his thoughts. Effective thoughts plus positive feelings followed up by purposeful actions equal success. An individual must somehow eliminate the self-defeating programs that reside in his or her subconscious mind—the self-defeating programs that continually sabotage his or her thinking.
I think it is possible that daily meditation is the path to releasing negative programming and replacing it with positive programming. Also meditation helps an individual reach what metaphysicians call the Superconscious Mind, God, The Divine, All There Is, etc. Once a person transcends the neurotic ego and releases the false subconscious programming that controls him—he has a chance of achieving success, abundance and happiness in his life. At least, that’s the way I see it.
Robert A. Meyer
I had a great improvement in my grades when I swiched schools and was no longer bullied. I was popular in my new school and graduated in the top 5%. How much brain platicity is numbed trough issues of bullying and labels. Its great as adults we can break out of these patterns and cycles.
Robert, I love your work, but you have misused the term “beg the question” one too many times for me. Below is an explanation from begthequestion.info to clarify its true meaning.
“Begging the question” is a form of logical fallacy in which a statement or claim is assumed to be true without evidence other than the statement or claim itself. When one begs the question, the initial assumption of a statement is treated as already proven without any logic to show why the statement is true in the first place.
A simple example would be “I think he is unattractive because he is ugly.” The adjective “ugly” does not explain why the subject is “unattractive” — they virtually amount to the same subjective meaning, and the proof is merely a restatement of the premise. The sentence has begged the question.
To beg the question does not mean “to raise the question.” (e.g. “It begs the question, why is he so dumb?”) This is a common error of usage made by those who mistake the word “question” in the phrase to refer to a literal question. Sadly, the error has grown more and more common with time, such that even journalists, advertisers, and major mass media entities have fallen prey to “BTQ Abuse.”
While descriptivists and other such laissez-faire linguists are content to allow the misconception to fall into the vernacular, it cannot be denied that logic and philosophy stand to lose an important conceptual label should the meaning of BTQ become diluted to the point that we must constantly distinguish between the traditional usage and the erroneous “modern” usage. This is why we fight.
1.Awesome comment above about the meditation. Thank $deity I clicked!
2.Yes, it IS possible to reprogram yourself. I’ve done it before. Similar story to yours: was a slack 2.8 student in college. Then I interned for my 1st ‘real world’ company for a summer before Junior year. After seeing how mind numbingly dull the corporate world was, I came to a very stark conclusion: If I don’t get my butt in gear, I’m gonna be put in a cubicle for the rest of my life..!
I got a 3.90 or so (1 “B”) until graduation & graduated with a 3.40 (cum laude).
All this is from a lifelong “B-” student. And they say fear isn’t a good motivator- HA!
3. Finally, a tip: Want to learn ANYTHING? Check out 5 books on the exact same topic in the library. 80% of the time your answer will be found in the pages of 1 of the books. But you never know which one will hit ‘you’ correctly…I suspect everyone comprehends information in different ways (probably because of our individual experiences)…so the right author for you might not be the best selling author…
-I have done this with school work (bought 5 ‘how to get straight As books), insomnia (gone!), & now I’m about to fix my diet for good.
Enjoy!