<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>The Greatest Economic Stimulus Plan Ever! Part IIComments on:  - by</title> <atom:link href="http://robertringer.com/2009/02/14/the-greatest-economic-stimulus-plan-ever-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://robertringer.com/2009/02/the-greatest-economic-stimulus-plan-ever-part-ii/</link> <description>In Support of Laissez-Faire Capitalism and Individual Freedom</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: michalenc</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2009/02/the-greatest-economic-stimulus-plan-ever-part-ii/#comment-2319</link> <dc:creator>michalenc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:57:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=450#comment-2319</guid> <description>Urine Test -- This guy has a point! This was written by a construction worker in Fort McMurray . Read on . . .
&gt;
&gt; I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes, and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to earn that pay check, I work on a rig site for a Fort McMurray construction project. At any time I am required to pass a random urine test, with which I have no problem. HOWEVER, what I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don&#039;t have to pass a urine test. Shouldn&#039;t one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them? Understand - I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do on the other hand have a problem with helping someone sit on their ass, drink beer and smoke dope. Could you imagine how much money this country would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check? If you agree, please pass this along, or simply delete if you don&#039;t. Hope you will pass it along though, because something has to change in this country.
&gt;
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; Construction Worker</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urine Test &#8212; This guy has a point! This was written by a construction worker in Fort McMurray . Read on . . .<br
/> &gt;<br
/> &gt; I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes, and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to earn that pay check, I work on a rig site for a Fort McMurray construction project. At any time I am required to pass a random urine test, with which I have no problem. HOWEVER, what I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don&#8217;t have to pass a urine test. Shouldn&#8217;t one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them? Understand &#8211; I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do on the other hand have a problem with helping someone sit on their ass, drink beer and smoke dope. Could you imagine how much money this country would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check? If you agree, please pass this along, or simply delete if you don&#8217;t. Hope you will pass it along though, because something has to change in this country.<br
/> &gt;<br
/> &gt;<br
/> &gt;<br
/> &gt; Construction Worker</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Reality seeker</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2009/02/the-greatest-economic-stimulus-plan-ever-part-ii/#comment-2318</link> <dc:creator>Reality seeker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:20:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=450#comment-2318</guid> <description>Hello apabon,
I&#039;m sure Mr. Root understands the difference between &quot;PRINCIPAL&quot; and &quot;PRINCIPLE.&quot;
Please understand that a tremendous amount of spelling, grammar, and usage errors occur when busy people like Mr. Root take the time to blog. Even the best writers employ a proof reader.
Just look at my comments: I just proof read my own comments and they are filled with mistakes. For example, I used the word &quot;THAN&quot; when I should have used &quot;THEN.&quot; This is a very stupid mistake, but I can assure you apabon that I do know the difference.
I agree that all of us should strive for a high standard of excellence, that&#039;s why I&#039;m going back to collage, oops, I mean college, to major in English.(Plato believed that the final part of an individuals formal education should take place after the age of fifty; I agree.)
Thank you for pointing out the small mistakes, but don&#039;t you agree that Mr. Root has written a fine blog?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello apabon,</p><p>I&#8217;m sure Mr. Root understands the difference between &#8220;PRINCIPAL&#8221; and &#8220;PRINCIPLE.&#8221;</p><p>Please understand that a tremendous amount of spelling, grammar, and usage errors occur when busy people like Mr. Root take the time to blog. Even the best writers employ a proof reader.</p><p>Just look at my comments: I just proof read my own comments and they are filled with mistakes. For example, I used the word &#8220;THAN&#8221; when I should have used &#8220;THEN.&#8221; This is a very stupid mistake, but I can assure you apabon that I do know the difference.</p><p>I agree that all of us should strive for a high standard of excellence, that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m going back to collage, oops, I mean college, to major in English.(Plato believed that the final part of an individuals formal education should take place after the age of fifty; I agree.)</p><p>Thank you for pointing out the small mistakes, but don&#8217;t you agree that Mr. Root has written a fine blog?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: michalenc</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2009/02/the-greatest-economic-stimulus-plan-ever-part-ii/#comment-2317</link> <dc:creator>michalenc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:20:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=450#comment-2317</guid> <description>In my new book, The Conscience of a Libertarian: Empowering the Citizen Revolution With God, Guns, Gambling &amp; Tax Cuts, I explain exactly how that can be done.  (Then right below it you mention Wayne Allyn Root&#039;s new book entitled, &quot;Same Title.&quot;) I don&#039;t really care who wrote the book, but just thought I would point out that you are giving credit to two people who seemed to have wrote the same book.
On a second note, I love your articles. Except for one thing. You don&#039;t mention how we can truly and effectively organize ourselves in such a way to change America for the better. we need an answer on how to Overthrow the &quot;Give Me, GIVE ME, Give Me&quot; attitude.  Or how to educate the supposedly &#039;educated&#039; of America that Spending more money doesn&#039;t create a more stable society, when the overspending is what caused the lack of stability. Can we truly get rid of congress, and start over with a new breed? Someone who truly is not GREEDY for their own personal benefit, and find someone who is looking for the LONG TERM benefits of the Country? I could go on and on, but this is not my Soap Box. But I am outraged and I want to do something constructively about it.  I just don&#039;t know how.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my new book, The Conscience of a Libertarian: Empowering the Citizen Revolution With God, Guns, Gambling &amp; Tax Cuts, I explain exactly how that can be done.  (Then right below it you mention Wayne Allyn Root&#8217;s new book entitled, &#8220;Same Title.&#8221;) I don&#8217;t really care who wrote the book, but just thought I would point out that you are giving credit to two people who seemed to have wrote the same book.<br
/> On a second note, I love your articles. Except for one thing. You don&#8217;t mention how we can truly and effectively organize ourselves in such a way to change America for the better. we need an answer on how to Overthrow the &#8220;Give Me, GIVE ME, Give Me&#8221; attitude.  Or how to educate the supposedly &#8216;educated&#8217; of America that Spending more money doesn&#8217;t create a more stable society, when the overspending is what caused the lack of stability. Can we truly get rid of congress, and start over with a new breed? Someone who truly is not GREEDY for their own personal benefit, and find someone who is looking for the LONG TERM benefits of the Country? I could go on and on, but this is not my Soap Box. But I am outraged and I want to do something constructively about it.  I just don&#8217;t know how.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rmeyer</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2009/02/the-greatest-economic-stimulus-plan-ever-part-ii/#comment-2316</link> <dc:creator>rmeyer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:21:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=450#comment-2316</guid> <description>Wayne,
Your &quot;Economic Stimulus Plan&quot; is definitely a giant step in the right direction--although I&#039;m not sure it will satisfy anarcho-capitalists. Still, it would be in their best interest to support it.
Getting the masses and the political establishment to accept your logical arguments is a gargantuan task indeed.
The main reservation I have with one of your revolutionary ideas is a flat tax rate of 15% on all incomes up to $500,000 and 10% on incomes above this. How about 5% flat tax rate on incomes up to $500,000 and 2.5% on incomes above this.
Robert A. Meyer</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne,</p><p>Your &#8220;Economic Stimulus Plan&#8221; is definitely a giant step in the right direction&#8211;although I&#8217;m not sure it will satisfy anarcho-capitalists. Still, it would be in their best interest to support it.</p><p>Getting the masses and the political establishment to accept your logical arguments is a gargantuan task indeed.</p><p>The main reservation I have with one of your revolutionary ideas is a flat tax rate of 15% on all incomes up to $500,000 and 10% on incomes above this. How about 5% flat tax rate on incomes up to $500,000 and 2.5% on incomes above this.</p><p>Robert A. Meyer</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: apabon</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2009/02/the-greatest-economic-stimulus-plan-ever-part-ii/#comment-2315</link> <dc:creator>apabon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:03:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=450#comment-2315</guid> <description>It would be nice (and it would add credibility to the editorial comment) if we learned to use the correct words.  A PRINCIPLE is a fundamental truth or law basic to other truths. PRINCIPAL pertains to something that is primary. So people don&#039;t have a PRINCIPLE residence. they have a PRINCIPAL residence... and we can propose eliminating capital gains taxes on profits on the sale of their PRINCIPAL (primary, main) residence but not their PRINCIPLE residence (which might be the residence where, while not PRINCIPAL, the receive moral guidance :-) )
Don&#039;t want to nit-pick, but as a leading author, you have to set the example. :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice (and it would add credibility to the editorial comment) if we learned to use the correct words.  A PRINCIPLE is a fundamental truth or law basic to other truths. PRINCIPAL pertains to something that is primary. So people don&#8217;t have a PRINCIPLE residence. they have a PRINCIPAL residence&#8230; and we can propose eliminating capital gains taxes on profits on the sale of their PRINCIPAL (primary, main) residence but not their PRINCIPLE residence (which might be the residence where, while not PRINCIPAL, the receive moral guidance <img
src='http://robertringer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p><p>Don&#8217;t want to nit-pick, but as a leading author, you have to set the example. <img
src='http://robertringer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: eorourke</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2009/02/the-greatest-economic-stimulus-plan-ever-part-ii/#comment-2314</link> <dc:creator>eorourke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:19:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=450#comment-2314</guid> <description>Well, Mr. Ringer, that is a very interesting contribution.  It fits very well into the Libertarian thought process.  However, living in the land of liberals etc., your proposals will never fly.  As a small business owner, I can appreciate your points of view but????  A moritorium on collecting taxes( income and capital gains from both businesses and individuals?)  Where is the government going to derive their income in order to carry out their plans for full federal employment?  The reverse tax will never fly as you are giving more to the rich than you are to the poor.  The only way out for that to work is to literally flood the economy with so much cash that the government will realize their goal of making everybody a millionaire.  Then just about all of us would be millionaires only it would take a billion or more to live comfortably.  Wait a second, isn&#039;t that just what the government may be doing?  As such, we all would be in the 10% tax bracket.  Of course, the government then could start applying user fees to living in USA.  All activities would be prorated and a user fee would be charged to participate.  Of course, all activities would be purely optional including life itself.  The results could truly be Orwelian.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Mr. Ringer, that is a very interesting contribution.  It fits very well into the Libertarian thought process.  However, living in the land of liberals etc., your proposals will never fly.  As a small business owner, I can appreciate your points of view but????  A moritorium on collecting taxes( income and capital gains from both businesses and individuals?)  Where is the government going to derive their income in order to carry out their plans for full federal employment?  The reverse tax will never fly as you are giving more to the rich than you are to the poor.  The only way out for that to work is to literally flood the economy with so much cash that the government will realize their goal of making everybody a millionaire.  Then just about all of us would be millionaires only it would take a billion or more to live comfortably.  Wait a second, isn&#8217;t that just what the government may be doing?  As such, we all would be in the 10% tax bracket.  Of course, the government then could start applying user fees to living in USA.  All activities would be prorated and a user fee would be charged to participate.  Of course, all activities would be purely optional including life itself.  The results could truly be Orwelian.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Reality seeker</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2009/02/the-greatest-economic-stimulus-plan-ever-part-ii/#comment-2313</link> <dc:creator>Reality seeker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:00:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=450#comment-2313</guid> <description>Thank you Mr. Root and I look forward to reading your book:
The problem is that in order for libertarianism to actually work as a successful and long term system of government, socialism must be uprooted, crushed, and not just left to die, but forced to die. Many have sought socialism&#039;s death by attrition, and if you&#039;re among those with the believe in such means, than you will surely need some type of exogenous event to help you achieve your goals---such as a total breakdown of global financial markets brought on by hyperinflation. And even in a case such as this, socialism is more likely to die in a blood-bath than by the less violent means of attrition.
&quot;What I won&#039;t do is return to the failed theories of the last eight years that got us into this fix in the first place, because those theories have been tested and they have failed. And that&#039;s part of what the election in November was all about.&quot; President Barack Obama speaking on behalf of his stimulus plan.
I agree with the President&#039;s conclusion, that &quot;the theories of the past&quot; (i.e. the governmental conglomeration of socialism, conservatism, democracy, capitalism, market-socialism and statism) have resulted in a complete and total &quot;failure.&quot;  For the past eight years, and beyond, America has had what I call, [A Muddle Your Way Through Form Of Government---- A Muddleocracy.] This concept of our government is something that I finished developing 25 years ago after reading one of Mr. Ringers books.
So, no matter what you call it, &quot;compassionate conservatism&quot; for example, it just doesn&#039;t matter, because it all amounts to the same thing----&quot;failed theories of government.&quot; And if the president thinks he&#039;s going to succeed by replacing one failed theory with another old, tired, and worn-out theory that&#039;s totally out of touch with any sort of reality, than the president is not as smart as he is articulate---- he must be nothing more than a sophist, a true sophist that is patterned after those whom Plato spoke of in Socrates Defense.
Pure socialism, or any of its pestilential variants, should be placed in the hazardous waste pile of &quot; failed theories&quot; and not even considered as a viable option in any way, shape, or form. And it will take a real man, someone of the same caliber as President Andrew Jackson, to lead America back to the gold standard, abolish the Federal Reserve Bank, deal with an American blood-bath that&#039;s sure to result when the social welfare checks stop arriving, and than lead the rebuilding of libertarian democracy.
Consider this: What happens if socialism collapses or is forcibly ended? What kind of scenario will the President than be facing? One possibility is that extreme pockets of social unrest across America would ensue, including but not limited to: bloody riots, arson, vandalism, looting, widespread panic, and a rapidly expanding homeless population which would include both young and old. Can you imagine the abject poverty and despair if our Muddleocracy unwinds, just like our financial system is currently doing, until it totally collapses?
There are many other possible scenarios we could discuss, some of which have a less violent outcome, but one thing is for sure; right now America is trading in one failed theory for another failed theory which has been repackaged and labeled &quot;change we can believe in.&quot;
It is possible that America can continue to gradually fail and muddle through for the next 100 years. In my opinion, it is much more likely that a climatic collapse will take place sometime within the next 20 years. However, the possibility of a near term collapse, within the next 8 years, is growing.
Mr. Root, finally, let me say that even if you did manage to get your stimulus plan passed into law, do you realize that the wonderful advantages of your tax system would cause a flight of capitol to America from many other countries; thus, causing many other countries around the world to collapse from a lack of capitol which they need to support their own &quot;failed theories&quot; of government. The nature of globalization is one of interdependency between countries. Therefore if you&#039;re truly successful in rebuilding a libertarian democracy in America, I hope you have pondered some of the viciously cruel possibilities, probabilities, and likelihoods that present themselves as a result of your success.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Mr. Root and I look forward to reading your book:</p><p>The problem is that in order for libertarianism to actually work as a successful and long term system of government, socialism must be uprooted, crushed, and not just left to die, but forced to die. Many have sought socialism&#8217;s death by attrition, and if you&#8217;re among those with the believe in such means, than you will surely need some type of exogenous event to help you achieve your goals&#8212;such as a total breakdown of global financial markets brought on by hyperinflation. And even in a case such as this, socialism is more likely to die in a blood-bath than by the less violent means of attrition.</p><p>&#8220;What I won&#8217;t do is return to the failed theories of the last eight years that got us into this fix in the first place, because those theories have been tested and they have failed. And that&#8217;s part of what the election in November was all about.&#8221; President Barack Obama speaking on behalf of his stimulus plan.</p><p>I agree with the President&#8217;s conclusion, that &#8220;the theories of the past&#8221; (i.e. the governmental conglomeration of socialism, conservatism, democracy, capitalism, market-socialism and statism) have resulted in a complete and total &#8220;failure.&#8221;  For the past eight years, and beyond, America has had what I call, [A Muddle Your Way Through Form Of Government---- A Muddleocracy.] This concept of our government is something that I finished developing 25 years ago after reading one of Mr. Ringers books.</p><p>So, no matter what you call it, &#8220;compassionate conservatism&#8221; for example, it just doesn&#8217;t matter, because it all amounts to the same thing&#8212;-&#8221;failed theories of government.&#8221; And if the president thinks he&#8217;s going to succeed by replacing one failed theory with another old, tired, and worn-out theory that&#8217;s totally out of touch with any sort of reality, than the president is not as smart as he is articulate&#8212;- he must be nothing more than a sophist, a true sophist that is patterned after those whom Plato spoke of in Socrates Defense.</p><p>Pure socialism, or any of its pestilential variants, should be placed in the hazardous waste pile of &#8221; failed theories&#8221; and not even considered as a viable option in any way, shape, or form. And it will take a real man, someone of the same caliber as President Andrew Jackson, to lead America back to the gold standard, abolish the Federal Reserve Bank, deal with an American blood-bath that&#8217;s sure to result when the social welfare checks stop arriving, and than lead the rebuilding of libertarian democracy.</p><p>Consider this: What happens if socialism collapses or is forcibly ended? What kind of scenario will the President than be facing? One possibility is that extreme pockets of social unrest across America would ensue, including but not limited to: bloody riots, arson, vandalism, looting, widespread panic, and a rapidly expanding homeless population which would include both young and old. Can you imagine the abject poverty and despair if our Muddleocracy unwinds, just like our financial system is currently doing, until it totally collapses?</p><p>There are many other possible scenarios we could discuss, some of which have a less violent outcome, but one thing is for sure; right now America is trading in one failed theory for another failed theory which has been repackaged and labeled &#8220;change we can believe in.&#8221;</p><p>It is possible that America can continue to gradually fail and muddle through for the next 100 years. In my opinion, it is much more likely that a climatic collapse will take place sometime within the next 20 years. However, the possibility of a near term collapse, within the next 8 years, is growing.</p><p>Mr. Root, finally, let me say that even if you did manage to get your stimulus plan passed into law, do you realize that the wonderful advantages of your tax system would cause a flight of capitol to America from many other countries; thus, causing many other countries around the world to collapse from a lack of capitol which they need to support their own &#8220;failed theories&#8221; of government. The nature of globalization is one of interdependency between countries. Therefore if you&#8217;re truly successful in rebuilding a libertarian democracy in America, I hope you have pondered some of the viciously cruel possibilities, probabilities, and likelihoods that present themselves as a result of your success.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kenstremsky</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2009/02/the-greatest-economic-stimulus-plan-ever-part-ii/#comment-2312</link> <dc:creator>kenstremsky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:25:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=450#comment-2312</guid> <description>I recommend people read
&quot;The Hong Kong Tax System
-Key features and lessons for Policy Makers&quot;
http://www.freedomandprosperity.org/Papers/hongkong/hongkong.shtml
I discuss increasing sales taxes and tax cuts on savings and investments on http://www.newgeography.com/users/kenstremsky
Our national debt was less than 1 trillion dollars on January 20, 1981.  Our national debt is now more than 10 trillion dollars.  We need to be worried about the value of our currency.  We need to be worried about very high inflation.
We may end up with very high inflation and very high unemployment if the corporate tax rate is NOT reduced and taxation of savings and investments is NOT reduced.
Congress should eliminate the Federal Reserve or veto many of its decisions.
Congress may want to back our currency with gold, silver, and other commodities.
People may want to support an Amendment to the United States Constitution that allows state governments to &quot;coin Money&quot; - make gold coins and silver coins.
Sincerely,
Ken Stremsky</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend people read</p><p>&#8220;The Hong Kong Tax System</p><p>-Key features and lessons for Policy Makers&#8221;</p><p><a
href="http://www.freedomandprosperity.org/Papers/hongkong/hongkong.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.freedomandprosperity.org/Papers/hongkong/hongkong.shtml</a></p><p>I discuss increasing sales taxes and tax cuts on savings and investments on <a
href="http://www.newgeography.com/users/kenstremsky" rel="nofollow">http://www.newgeography.com/users/kenstremsky</a></p><p>Our national debt was less than 1 trillion dollars on January 20, 1981.  Our national debt is now more than 10 trillion dollars.  We need to be worried about the value of our currency.  We need to be worried about very high inflation.</p><p>We may end up with very high inflation and very high unemployment if the corporate tax rate is NOT reduced and taxation of savings and investments is NOT reduced.</p><p>Congress should eliminate the Federal Reserve or veto many of its decisions.</p><p>Congress may want to back our currency with gold, silver, and other commodities.</p><p>People may want to support an Amendment to the United States Constitution that allows state governments to &#8220;coin Money&#8221; &#8211; make gold coins and silver coins.</p><p>Sincerely,</p><p>Ken Stremsky</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: News about Real Estate Investments &#187; Archive &#187; Robert Ringer#39;s Voice of Sanity Blog</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2009/02/the-greatest-economic-stimulus-plan-ever-part-ii/#comment-2311</link> <dc:creator>News about Real Estate Investments &#187; Archive &#187; Robert Ringer#39;s Voice of Sanity Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:05:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=450#comment-2311</guid> <description>[...] Robert Ringer added an interesting post today on Robert Ringer#39;s Voice of Sanity BlogHere&#8217;s a small readingIt would work like this: Buy a piece of America (stocks, bonds, breal estate/b, a small business, etc.), hold that binvestment/b for five years, and pay ZERO capital gains taxes on it. In the first year, capital gains earned on your b&#8230;/b [...] </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Robert Ringer added an interesting post today on Robert Ringer#39;s Voice of Sanity BlogHere&#8217;s a small readingIt would work like this: Buy a piece of America (stocks, bonds, breal estate/b, a small business, etc.), hold that binvestment/b for five years, and pay ZERO capital gains taxes on it. In the first year, capital gains earned on your b&#8230;/b [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: News about Real Estate Investments &#187; Archive &#187; The Greatest Economic Stimulus Plan Ever! Part II</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2009/02/the-greatest-economic-stimulus-plan-ever-part-ii/#comment-2310</link> <dc:creator>News about Real Estate Investments &#187; Archive &#187; The Greatest Economic Stimulus Plan Ever! Part II</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:06:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=450#comment-2310</guid> <description>[...] Robert Ringer&#8217;s Blog added an interesting post today on The Greatest Economic Stimulus Plan Ever! Part IIHere&#8217;s a small reading &#8230; he things that make our economy go and grow: stocks, bonds, real estate, investment property, small business&#8230;. [...] </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Robert Ringer&#8217;s Blog added an interesting post today on The Greatest Economic Stimulus Plan Ever! Part IIHere&#8217;s a small reading &#8230; he things that make our economy go and grow: stocks, bonds, real estate, investment property, small business&#8230;. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
