<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>The Justification for Lying, Part I: Obama Is ChosenComments on:  - by</title> <atom:link href="http://robertringer.com/2008/11/14/the-justification-for-lying-part-i-obama-is-chosen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://robertringer.com/2008/11/the-justification-for-lying-part-i-obama-is-chosen/</link> <description>In Support of Laissez-Faire Capitalism and Individual Freedom</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Glenn Evans</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2008/11/the-justification-for-lying-part-i-obama-is-chosen/#comment-1967</link> <dc:creator>Glenn Evans</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:21:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=182#comment-1967</guid> <description>I went to the website referenced above by lwlmedia specifically:
http://www.wholetruthcoalition.org/2008/11/06/the-men-behind-obama/
and what it portrays (if I understood it correctly) is a Manchurian Candidate who looks like more like what is often called a &quot;right wing warmonger&quot; than a socialist. I had thought that Obama was a John Lennon &quot;Imagine&quot; type marxist. Interestingly enough, the emphasis on Afghanistan and military operations into Pakistan fit with what Tarpley is saying. If he is right (and I am not convinced that he is) then hang on we are in for a heck of a ride!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to the website referenced above by lwlmedia specifically:<br
/> <a
href="http://www.wholetruthcoalition.org/2008/11/06/the-men-behind-obama/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wholetruthcoalition.org/2008/11/06/the-men-behind-obama/</a><br
/> and what it portrays (if I understood it correctly) is a Manchurian Candidate who looks like more like what is often called a &#8220;right wing warmonger&#8221; than a socialist. I had thought that Obama was a John Lennon &#8220;Imagine&#8221; type marxist. Interestingly enough, the emphasis on Afghanistan and military operations into Pakistan fit with what Tarpley is saying. If he is right (and I am not convinced that he is) then hang on we are in for a heck of a ride!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert Ringer</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2008/11/the-justification-for-lying-part-i-obama-is-chosen/#comment-1966</link> <dc:creator>Robert Ringer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:44:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=182#comment-1966</guid> <description>Response to Brian Richard Allen:
GAVEC = Guiltism - Angerism - Villainism - Envyism - Covetism</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Response to Brian Richard Allen:</p><p>GAVEC = Guiltism &#8211; Angerism &#8211; Villainism &#8211; Envyism &#8211; Covetism</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian Richard Allen</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2008/11/the-justification-for-lying-part-i-obama-is-chosen/#comment-1965</link> <dc:creator>Brian Richard Allen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:18:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=182#comment-1965</guid> <description>What&#039;s &quot;GAVEC?&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s &#8220;GAVEC?&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Moresage</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2008/11/the-justification-for-lying-part-i-obama-is-chosen/#comment-1964</link> <dc:creator>Moresage</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:04:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=182#comment-1964</guid> <description>Americans Today are too sorry to deserve any kind of consideration for their mass Stupidity.  They elected a non-person expecting Change.  They do not know what Change is.  They deserve what they get... nothing.  The America I know and Love intensely will not survive another 25 years because Americans are so unconscious they do not even know what is going on in the world today.  They depend upon the mainstream media for information and the media is made up of LIARS&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans Today are too sorry to deserve any kind of consideration for their mass Stupidity.  They elected a non-person expecting Change.  They do not know what Change is.  They deserve what they get&#8230; nothing.  The America I know and Love intensely will not survive another 25 years because Americans are so unconscious they do not even know what is going on in the world today.  They depend upon the mainstream media for information and the media is made up of LIARS&gt;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JamesHurley</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2008/11/the-justification-for-lying-part-i-obama-is-chosen/#comment-1963</link> <dc:creator>JamesHurley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:11:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=182#comment-1963</guid> <description>Something you might not know...certainly Glowbama would rather you did not...Obama reputedly helped steel workers in the Chicago area. South Town Star, a Chicago newspaper reported on 24 August 2007...&quot;And none of the laid-off steelworkers Obama talks about in stump speeches, the people he was brought to Chicago to help, could be found for this article, despite repeated requests to the (Obama) campaign.&quot;
I hope I am wrong. I expect to be correct...&quot;Glowbama&quot; might just turn out to be D&#039;ohbama.
&quot;Oft expectation fails, and  most oft where most it promises.&quot; W Shakespeare</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something you might not know&#8230;certainly Glowbama would rather you did not&#8230;Obama reputedly helped steel workers in the Chicago area. South Town Star, a Chicago newspaper reported on 24 August 2007&#8230;&#8221;And none of the laid-off steelworkers Obama talks about in stump speeches, the people he was brought to Chicago to help, could be found for this article, despite repeated requests to the (Obama) campaign.&#8221;</p><p>I hope I am wrong. I expect to be correct&#8230;&#8221;Glowbama&#8221; might just turn out to be D&#8217;ohbama.</p><p>&#8220;Oft expectation fails, and  most oft where most it promises.&#8221; W Shakespeare</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lwlmedia</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2008/11/the-justification-for-lying-part-i-obama-is-chosen/#comment-1962</link> <dc:creator>lwlmedia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:06:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=182#comment-1962</guid> <description>For anybody who still wants to glorify Obama as some altruistic, independent-thinking, rebel &quot;change maker&quot; with a penchant for critical-thinking, here&#039;s something to chew on:
The Men Behind Obama:
http://www.wholetruthcoalition.org/2008/11/06/the-men-behind-obama/
A Two part interview with Webster Tarpley describing who is behind Obama and pulling the strings on the president elect and the plans behind it for the future. A must watch with brilliant insight and analysis</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anybody who still wants to glorify Obama as some altruistic, independent-thinking, rebel &#8220;change maker&#8221; with a penchant for critical-thinking, here&#8217;s something to chew on:</p><p>The Men Behind Obama:<br
/> <a
href="http://www.wholetruthcoalition.org/2008/11/06/the-men-behind-obama/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wholetruthcoalition.org/2008/11/06/the-men-behind-obama/</a></p><p>A Two part interview with Webster Tarpley describing who is behind Obama and pulling the strings on the president elect and the plans behind it for the future. A must watch with brilliant insight and analysis</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gkelly</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2008/11/the-justification-for-lying-part-i-obama-is-chosen/#comment-1961</link> <dc:creator>gkelly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 02:11:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=182#comment-1961</guid> <description>The test of any nation is the strength of its institutions and the value of its people and culture.
Even if the conspiracy were true, the USA would have to suffer a massive corruption of community values and major breakdowns in the checks and balances of its democratic institutions. Even with the support of a Congressional majority, that great institution has always proven a balance on the excesses of a President.
If teh USA is brought down by one man and the dark forces behind it, it was coming down anyway. I think that this prognosis is premature.
However, he will bear watching, just like all into whose hands we confer a measure of influence over our lives.
Meanwhile, let&#039;s all get on with hte job of making our world a better place, day by day, hour by hour, relationship bey relationship.
Best
Geoff</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The test of any nation is the strength of its institutions and the value of its people and culture.</p><p>Even if the conspiracy were true, the USA would have to suffer a massive corruption of community values and major breakdowns in the checks and balances of its democratic institutions. Even with the support of a Congressional majority, that great institution has always proven a balance on the excesses of a President.</p><p>If teh USA is brought down by one man and the dark forces behind it, it was coming down anyway. I think that this prognosis is premature.</p><p>However, he will bear watching, just like all into whose hands we confer a measure of influence over our lives.</p><p>Meanwhile, let&#8217;s all get on with hte job of making our world a better place, day by day, hour by hour, relationship bey relationship.</p><p>Best</p><p>Geoff</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jay the Tenor</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2008/11/the-justification-for-lying-part-i-obama-is-chosen/#comment-1960</link> <dc:creator>Jay the Tenor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:23:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=182#comment-1960</guid> <description>With Obama as president, I hope that the change he brings is not the unmitigated disaster that I expect.  That aside; what do you consider to be wrong w/gay marriage?  It&#039;s a voluntary relationship between consenting adults.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Obama as president, I hope that the change he brings is not the unmitigated disaster that I expect.  That aside; what do you consider to be wrong w/gay marriage?  It&#8217;s a voluntary relationship between consenting adults.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bnalo</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2008/11/the-justification-for-lying-part-i-obama-is-chosen/#comment-1959</link> <dc:creator>bnalo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:40:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=182#comment-1959</guid> <description>What difference does it make that he is half-white.  So are many other African-Americans. When America considers a person&#039;s race/ethnicity, any part African-American you are considered African American. No one has considered my Native American or White heritage either. We didn&#039;t make the rules. The American government did. Maybe I miss understood your point. Could you further clarify why you made that comment?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What difference does it make that he is half-white.  So are many other African-Americans. When America considers a person&#8217;s race/ethnicity, any part African-American you are considered African American. No one has considered my Native American or White heritage either. We didn&#8217;t make the rules. The American government did. Maybe I miss understood your point. Could you further clarify why you made that comment?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rajjpuut</title><link>http://robertringer.com/2008/11/the-justification-for-lying-part-i-obama-is-chosen/#comment-1958</link> <dc:creator>Rajjpuut</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:43:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.robertringer.com/?p=182#comment-1958</guid> <description>Hey Tortoise,
Four of the big lies about Obama:
A.  Racism might cost him the election:  only 5% of blacks voted for McCain; 47% of whites voted for Obama, so which group is really expressing racism as they go into the ballot box?  And which group&#039;s racist voting pattern won the election for its candidate?
B.  Racism based upon skin color is a white man&#039;s issue only:  the black community has been repeatedly shown to be unenthusiatic about darker-blacks (Clarence Thomas)while light-skinned blacks like Jesse Jackson and Obama are found somehow to be much more intelligent and &quot;charismatic&quot; then their &quot;more African&quot; brothers
C.  Obama inspires the black community because he made it on his own:  C1. While Obama did show marvelous scholarship at Harvard, the question the media never deigned to investigate was how, exactly, did he pay for Harvard?  The Obama campaign says &quot;hard work and student loans&quot; but the question has been raised, did he actually have Muslim financial backing?  The question has NOT been explored adequately and now it probably never will. C2 The Black community vilified Clarence Thomas a dark-skinned man who by all reports earned everything he got including his appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court . . . Thomas, you see, votes conservative and does not agree with affirmative action in any form.  In a way, Thomas harkens back to Frederick Douglas who answered the question &quot;How can we help the Negro?&quot; by saying, &quot;. . . get out of his way, let him stand on his own two feet and prove himself.&quot;  Blacks who do NOT espouse the &quot;party line&quot; that affirmative action in absolutely necessary are called &quot;Uncle Tom&#039;s&quot; and cannot be considered truly part of the black community.
D.  Obama is an upstanding citizen:  Obama came in clear second to Hillary Clinton in the primary states but won an amazing 13 of the 14 caucus states (some of which held concurrent primaries) by illegally busing in out-of-state voters from next door (first one: Illinois people riding into nearby Iowa)state black communities; strong-arming; and outright fraud (of course any state stupid enough to use a caucus set up is leaving itself wide open to such tactics definitely deserves to see its results discredited). The DNC as well as the media refused to &quot;disannoint&quot; the chosen one despite thousands of provable and valid claims that were lodged.  Here are just two of thousands of websites documenting the issue (search for &quot;Obama caucus victories fraud&quot; and you&#039;ll get at least 234,000 web-hits):
ireport.com/docs/DOC-126863
texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/caucus-fraud-proof/
&quot;Mr. Upstanding&quot; doesn&#039;t look so good once you start to look closer.
Bob VanDeHey</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tortoise,</p><p>Four of the big lies about Obama:</p><p>A.  Racism might cost him the election:  only 5% of blacks voted for McCain; 47% of whites voted for Obama, so which group is really expressing racism as they go into the ballot box?  And which group&#8217;s racist voting pattern won the election for its candidate?</p><p>B.  Racism based upon skin color is a white man&#8217;s issue only:  the black community has been repeatedly shown to be unenthusiatic about darker-blacks (Clarence Thomas)while light-skinned blacks like Jesse Jackson and Obama are found somehow to be much more intelligent and &#8220;charismatic&#8221; then their &#8220;more African&#8221; brothers</p><p>C.  Obama inspires the black community because he made it on his own:  C1. While Obama did show marvelous scholarship at Harvard, the question the media never deigned to investigate was how, exactly, did he pay for Harvard?  The Obama campaign says &#8220;hard work and student loans&#8221; but the question has been raised, did he actually have Muslim financial backing?  The question has NOT been explored adequately and now it probably never will. C2 The Black community vilified Clarence Thomas a dark-skinned man who by all reports earned everything he got including his appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court . . . Thomas, you see, votes conservative and does not agree with affirmative action in any form.  In a way, Thomas harkens back to Frederick Douglas who answered the question &#8220;How can we help the Negro?&#8221; by saying, &#8220;. . . get out of his way, let him stand on his own two feet and prove himself.&#8221;  Blacks who do NOT espouse the &#8220;party line&#8221; that affirmative action in absolutely necessary are called &#8220;Uncle Tom&#8217;s&#8221; and cannot be considered truly part of the black community.</p><p>D.  Obama is an upstanding citizen:  Obama came in clear second to Hillary Clinton in the primary states but won an amazing 13 of the 14 caucus states (some of which held concurrent primaries) by illegally busing in out-of-state voters from next door (first one: Illinois people riding into nearby Iowa)state black communities; strong-arming; and outright fraud (of course any state stupid enough to use a caucus set up is leaving itself wide open to such tactics definitely deserves to see its results discredited). The DNC as well as the media refused to &#8220;disannoint&#8221; the chosen one despite thousands of provable and valid claims that were lodged.  Here are just two of thousands of websites documenting the issue (search for &#8220;Obama caucus victories fraud&#8221; and you&#8217;ll get at least 234,000 web-hits):</p><p> ireport.com/docs/DOC-126863<br
/> texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/caucus-fraud-proof/</p><p>&#8220;Mr. Upstanding&#8221; doesn&#8217;t look so good once you start to look closer.</p><p>Bob VanDeHey</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
